백남준 아트센터에서 준비하고 있는 The NJP Reader #1에서 준 서면 인터뷰를 준비하는 과정에서 '백남준과 관계미학'의 문제에 직면한다. 세 가지 질문은 다음과 같다.
1. Artistic anthropology intends to produce novel models of relationality and connectivity. Could – Nam June Paik's legacy as a form of – artistic anthropology contribute to an artistic discourse going beyond the framework of relational aesthetics? Who are the artists in our day developing relevant examples of rethinking and recontextualizing an artistic anthropology?
2. What could artistic anthropology mean for a current artistic practice? How could it relate to medium-specific qualities? Is it a form of artistic communication defined by a post-medium condition? Or is it a practice that demands the concept of medium-specificity to change?
3. What could artistic anthropology - as a form of knowledge production - mean for the current classification system? Will it challenge the dominant paradigms of the established humanities and sciences? What type of new models might this trigger? How can artistic anthropology contribute to a better and more political understanding of the human condition? And what could artistic anthropology mean for the concept of art in general?
공통도시, 다중의 로두스
