Komuniga Maŝino:Blogo de Amelano :: Pri riĉeco kaj saneco de socio

Legi 2006/11/06 17:49

Pri riĉeco kaj saneco de socio

Markso skribas en Grundrisse(Vintage Books, p. 448).

"Fakte, tamen, kiam la limiĝita burĝara formo malvestiĝas, kio estas riĉeco pli ol la universaleco de individua bezonoj, kapablecoj, ĝojoj, produktiva forto ktp., kio estas kreita tra universala interŝanĝo? La plena evoluo de homa mastro sur la fortoj de naturo, fortoj de ne nur tiel nomata naturo sed ankaŭ homara mem naturo?"
(tradukita per Amelano de "In fact, however, when the limited bourgeois form is stripped away, what is wealth other than the universality of individual needs, capacities, pleasures, productive forces etc., created through universal exchange? The full development of human mastery over the forces of nature, those of so-called nature as well as of humanity's own nature?")

Jen sekvas sekva frazoj (en angla lingvo):

The absolute working-out of his creative potentialities, with no presupposition other than the previous historic development, which makes this totality of development, i.e. the development of all human powers as such the end in itself, not as measured on a predetermined
yardstick? Where he does not reproduce himself in one specificity, but produces his totality? Strives not to remain something he has become, but is in the absolute movement of becoming? In bourgeois economics -- and in the epoch of production to which it corresponds -- this complete working-out of the human content appears as a complete emptying-out, this universal objectification as total alienation, and the tearing-down of all limited, one-sided aims as sacrifice of the human end-in-itself to an entirely external end. This is why the childish world of antiquity appears on one side as loftier. On the other side, it really is loftier in all matters where closed shapes, forms and given limits are sought for. It is satisfaction from a limited standpoint; while the modern gives no satisfaction; or, where it appears satisfied with itself, it is vulgar.

Markso pensas pri riĉeco(wealth) konsciante Adamsmith.
Sed ĉu ni bezonas pensi pli pri saneco(health) de socio ol riĉeco de socio?